How Much Longer is Motorola’s Shelf Life in the United States?

motorola ban 298x300A while back I brought you information about a potential ban on Motorola devices here in the United States. It is with a heavy heart and much displeasure that I have to announce said ban officially begins today.

Motorola Mobility intends to make sure that their Android devices continue to be available to US customers, but have not disclosed exactly how they intend to make it happen.

The ban is due to an infringement upon a Microsoft patent and the ITC has ruled that 18 of Motorola’s devices have infringed the patent, which relates to Exchange Active Sync. The 60-day presidential review period is now over and Moto’s clock has run out. Have a look at the full list of devices affected by the ban below:

  • Atrix
  • Backflip
  • Bravo
  • Charm
  • Cliq
  • Cliq
  • Cliq XT
  • Defy
  • Devour
  • Droid 2
  • Droid 2 Global
  • Droid Pro
  • Droid X
  • Droid X2
  • Flipout
  • Flipside
  • Spice
  • Xoom

Motorola’s options are to either pay Microsoft license fees for ActiveSync technology, remove the feature that is the cause of concern, or provide a software update that takes another route at handling the same functionality. No word yet on what option will be chosen, but I’m sure Motorola isn’t just going to roll over and play dead while Microsoft takes them to the cleaners.

Theres is also no word on whether Motorola will still try to have its devices imported into the United States after Wednesday. There is a likelihood that enough devices have been pre-stockpiled to continue to supply demand without relying on importing. A bond of 33 cents for every device imported since I last reported was mandated to be paid by Motorola during the review period.

The 18 devices listed are not the only ones limited to the ban. Any device found that infringes upon the patent will be covered in the ban up until April 10, 2018. Microsoft and Motorola have an ongoing feud, and Motorola is setting its sights on securing a ban on the Xbox 360 (when will the mud-slinging ever end?).

Currently, Microsoft collects royalties on 70 Android smartphones in the US and Motorola is the only manufacture defying Microsoft in this aspect. With Motorola stating that it intends to maintain device availability we will just have to wait and see how they will comply with the ITC, and if they will be able to come to some compromise with Microsoft.

Via: BGR

User Rating: 0 (0 votes)
Involved with Android since the Cupcake days, Taji (B.K.A. Screw Muggz in G+ circles) is a developer and Android obsessed fanatic. If not somewhere deep in code or flashing a new ROM, he likes to shame owners of lesser devices for their poor choice of purchase. Highly elusive, but you can catch him on Google+ or track his latest known movements on Twitter.
  • http://profiles.google.com/wacomalt Ben Sumner

    so just remove exchange and activesync… done. Why is this an issue? Why support a company’s software that’s only interested in a patent war? (not that Moto isn’t guilty of the same thing)

    • http://omgdroid.com/ Tony Simons

      I couldn’t agree more. And great point. Even as an Android enthusiast, it’s important to distinguish that we’re (Android OEM’s) not always angels ourselves.

    • Greg Billetdeaux

      It’s not that simple. You remove that, and you remove the functionality to check any email that is non-gmail, yahoo, aol, or other name brand. So basically, anyone with their work, school, personal website email on their phone, would lose that functionality.

      That would piss me off. They just need pay like the 5-6 other manufacturers. If Samsung and HTC can pay, so can Mobility (especially now that they’re owned by Google).

    • http://twitter.com/strifejester Justin Ellenbecker

      The real problem is the XOOM. This is a Google device, granted they are now the same company but were not when this was released. Microsoft should not be able to sue Motorola for using the software that is included in AOSP unless the changed it which from everything I can tell they did not. There is a huge problem with system and they need to fix it. Motorola can’t remove ActiveSync without creating a new email application from the ground up which will take time. Or they have to mod the crap out of the AOSP email application.

      • Greg Billetdeaux

        Google doesn’t profit directly from the sales of any non-Nexus device. In this case, Motorola profits from Xoom sales.

        Just like you can go to the tint shop and get your car tinted illegally. Cops are going to pull you over and give you the ticket, not the shop.

    • willow mouse

      because you instantly alienate the corporate market who use and rely on Exchange (like us)

  • Pingback: UK Judge Deals Apple an Embarrassing Blow in Galaxy Tab Infringement Case

  • Josh Parker

    Doesn’t Microsoft now own Motorola Mobility? This seems the equivalent of punching yourself in the face.

    • http://omgdroid.com/ Tony Simons

      No. Google owns Motorola.